Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-14244
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorMarzouk, Mai Adel Fathy-
dc.contributor.authorSalheen, Mohamed A.-
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Leonie K.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-23T11:53:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-23T11:53:36Z-
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn2296-665X-
dc.identifier.other1887242546-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-ds-142638de
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/14263-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-14244-
dc.description.abstractThe building sector is one of the most resource-intensive industries. In Egypt, buildings consume 60% of electricity, produce 8% of CO2 emissions, and anthropize agricultural land, peri-urban and urban landscapes. To compensate for these consumption patterns, building envelopes can become productive in terms of greening and energy production. This encompasses the implementation of productive building systems that include (a) greening systems such as building-integrated vegetation and agriculture systems and (b) solar energy systems such as building-applied and integrated photovoltaics. For Egypt, the transformation toward more productive buildings still lacks a holistic understanding of their status and implementation requirements. This paper undergoes a comprehensive analysis of the two systems’ classifications, benefits, challenges, and implementation aspects based on a thorough assessment of 121 studies and 20 reports addressing them. This is coupled with a contextual analysis using questionnaires (n = 35) and semi-structured interviews (n = 13) with Egyptian experts and suppliers. Results showed that a large variety of systems is studied in literature and exists in the local market. Among the most purchased productive building systems in the Egyptian market, according to experts, are hydroponics (selected by 75% of respondents), planter boxes/pots (50%), roof-mounted photovoltaic panels (95%), and solar water heaters (55%). The main benefits of greening and solar energy systems are identified as enjoying the greenery view (95%) and reducing energy expenses (100%), respectively. The high initial cost was considered the main barrier for both systems. Multiple commonalities between the two systems in terms of spatial and environmental applicability aspects (e.g., accessibility and safety, net useable area, sun exposure, wind exposure) and environmental performance aspects (e.g., energy demand and emissions reduction, heat flow reduction) were identified. Lastly, we highlight the importance of analyzing integrated solutions that make use of the identified synergies between the systems and maximize the production potentials.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.uridoi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.1056382de
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
dc.subject.ddc333.7de
dc.subject.ddc710de
dc.titleFunctionalizing building envelopes for greening and solar energy : between theory and the practice in Egypten
dc.typearticlede
dc.date.updated2023-11-13T22:18:09Z-
ubs.fakultaetArchitektur und Stadtplanungde
ubs.fakultaetFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.institutInstitut für Landschaftsplanung und Ökologiede
ubs.institutFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.publikation.seiten27de
ubs.publikation.sourceFrontiers in environmental science 10 (2022), No. 1056382de
ubs.publikation.typZeitschriftenartikelde
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:01 Fakultät Architektur und Stadtplanung

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
fenvs-10-1056382.pdfArtikel3,65 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen
DataSheet1.pdfSupplement380,28 kBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons