06 Fakultät Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik und Geodäsie
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/7
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Open Access Gust alleviation by spanwise load control applied on a forward and backward swept wing(2023) Klug, Lorenz; Ullah, Junaid; Lutz, Thorsten; Streit, Thomas; Heinrich, Ralf; Radespiel, RolfThe present paper investigates the feasibility of gust load alleviation at transonic speeds on a backward swept and a forward swept transport aircraft configuration. Spanwise-distributed control surfaces at the leading and trailing edges are employed to control gust-induced wing bending as well as wing torsion moments. The deflection amplitude and temporal flap actuation are determined by a novel scheme that builds on the aerodynamic strip theory. The aerodynamic effectiveness of the actuators is taken from a data base, computed from either 2D infinite swept wing simulations, or from yawed computations that take the effects of boundary-layer cross flow and the local sweep angle of the control surface into account. The present numerical flow simulations reveal that careful application of control laws at the trailing edge alleviates wing bending moments caused by strong vertical gusts by 85-90%, for both aircraft configurations. The application of leading-edge flaps introduces significant nonlinear aerodynamic interactions, that make the control of torsional moments comparably challenging. Here, the present results indicate that about 60% of wing torsion loads due to strong gusts can be removed.Item Open Access Reynolds number and wind tunnel wall effects on the flow field around a generic UHBR engine high-lift configuration(2020) Ullah, Junaid; Prachař, Aleš; Šmíd, Miroslav; Seifert, Avraham; Soudakov, Vitaly; Lutz, Thorsten; Krämer, EwaldRANS simulations of a generic ultra-high bypass ratio engine high-lift configuration were conducted in three different environments. The purpose of this study is to assess small scale tests in an atmospheric closed test section wind tunnel regarding transferability to large scale tests in an open-jet wind tunnel. Special emphasis was placed on the flow field in the separation prone region downstream from the extended slat cut-out. Validation with wind tunnel test data shows an adequate agreement with CFD results. The cross-comparison of the three sets of simulations allowed to identify the effects of the Reynolds number and the wind tunnel walls on the flow field separately. The simulations reveal significant blockage effects and corner flow separation induced by the test section walls. By comparison, the Reynolds number effects are negligible. A decrease of the incidence angle for the small scale model allows to successfully reproduce the flow field of the large scale model despite severe wind tunnel wall effects.Item Open Access Investigation of a realistic flap modeling using a combination of Chimera method and grid deformation on a wing fuselage configuration(2023) Hillebrand, Marco; Müller, Jens; Ullah, Junaid; Lutz, ThorstenFlap deflections of an aircraft wing for active load alleviation within CFD simulations are realized using pure grid deformation due to time saving and low modeling complexity. In this case, spanwise gaps are neglected, which are present in reality during a flap deflection. Another possibility to realize the deflections is the combination of pure grid deformation and Chimera method, which allows the modeling of the gap between flap and wing or consecutive flaps. The overall aim of this work is the analysis of the aerodynamic effects caused by the different modeling approaches realizing leading and trailing edge flap deflections. The comparison of the modeling methods is investigated on the DLR LEISA configuration, which is a generic wing‐fuselage configuration. For active gust load alleviation, the leading edge flaps are deflected downward and the trailing edge flaps are deflected upward. Due to the downward deflection of the leading edge flaps, vortices are formed using the combined Chimera method as a result of the gap consideration. These vortices lead to a local drag increase resulting in a difference between both modeling methods in the spanwise as well as global drag coefficient. With the pure grid deformation these vortices do not occur. Due to the upward trailing edge deflection, the combined Chimera method leads to a pressure compensation via the effective gap enlargement, which is not present in the pure grid deformation. Overall, the combined Chimera method offers a good possibility to model the induced drag as well as the pressure compensation at a large flap deflection.