Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-5491
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorGoldschmidt, Rüdigerde
dc.contributor.authorRenn, Ortwinde
dc.contributor.authorKöppel, Sonjade
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-16de
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-31T09:11:51Z-
dc.date.available2008-04-16de
dc.date.available2016-03-31T09:11:51Z-
dc.date.issued2008de
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-938245-08-8de
dc.identifier.other281715947de
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-34898de
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/5508-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-5491-
dc.description.abstractThe report summarises the findings of the evalaution project focused on the European Citizens Consultations Project. The evaluation was conducted on behalf of the King Baudouin Foundation, Brussels. Its major objective was to review the methodological concept and design, but also the organisational and process-related qualities of the European Citizens’ Consultations (ECC) project. The evaluation especially focused on the conditions, the promoting and impeding factors for initiating, conducting and sustaining a constructive dialogue among citizens from all EU member countries. The evaluation was mainly based on four criteria: fairness, competence, efficiency and transparency. The ECC dialogue process (www.european-citizens-consultations.eu) was initiated by the Agenda-Setting Event in Brussels in October 2006 with 200 citizens from all EU countries. In February and March 2007, national consultation events took place in each member state of the European Union. The purpose of the national consultation processes was to further elaborate the topics that were developed and selected during the Agenda-Setting Event. The final report was adopted in May 2007 during the final event in Brussels (Synthesis Event) by citizens from all European countries. The evaluation team of DIALOGIK used three main methods for data input and processing: ·Direct observations during all events at European level and 12 selected national consultation events (documentation of general and specific features of the dialogue process by using a pre-structured observation sheet) ·Personal/telephone interviews with key actors (coordinators, facilitators, stakeholders and involved citizens) as well as ·Written surveys among the participants during all events at European level and the selected national consultations to elicit participants’ perceptions and assessments regarding the process and the results developed. In addition, the evaluation team analysed the project’s website and other documents of the ECC-project as well as “external” websites. For getting impressions on the repercussions in the media, the evaluation team conducted a media analysis of a number of sources.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStuttgarter Beiträge zur Risiko- und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung;8de
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde
dc.subject.classificationEvaluation , Partizipation , Bürgerbeteiligung , Deliberative Demokratiede
dc.subject.ddc300de
dc.subject.otherEuropäische Bürgerkonferenzende
dc.subject.otherEuropean Citizens Consultations Project , public deliberation , participationen
dc.titleEuropean citizens' consultations project : final evaluation reporten
dc.typeworkingPaperde
dc.date.updated2012-08-16de
ubs.fakultaetFakultät Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftende
ubs.institutInstitut für Sozialwissenschaftende
ubs.opusid3489de
ubs.publikation.typArbeitspapierde
ubs.schriftenreihe.nameStuttgarter Beiträge zur Risiko- und Nachhaltigkeitsforschungde
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:10 Fakultät Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
AB008_Goldschmidt_Renn_Koeppel.pdf1,32 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repositorium sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.