Permeability estimation of regular porous structures : a benchmark for comparison of methods

dc.contributor.authorWagner, Arndt
dc.contributor.authorEggenweiler, Elissa
dc.contributor.authorWeinhardt, Felix
dc.contributor.authorTrivedi, Zubin
dc.contributor.authorKrach, David
dc.contributor.authorLohrmann, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorJain, Kartik
dc.contributor.authorKaradimitriou, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorBringedal, Carina
dc.contributor.authorVoland, Paul
dc.contributor.authorHolm, Christian
dc.contributor.authorClass, Holger
dc.contributor.authorSteeb, Holger
dc.contributor.authorRybak, Iryna
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-02T10:18:29Z
dc.date.available2023-05-02T10:18:29Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.date.updated2023-03-25T09:15:04Z
dc.description.abstractThe intrinsic permeability is a crucial parameter to characterise and quantify fluid flow through porous media. However, this parameter is typically uncertain, even if the geometry of the pore structure is available. In this paper, we perform a comparative study of experimental, semi-analytical and numerical methods to calculate the permeability of a regular porous structure. In particular, we use the Kozeny-Carman relation, different homogenisation approaches (3D, 2D, very thin porous media and pseudo 2D/3D), pore-scale simulations (lattice Boltzmann method, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics and finite-element method) and pore-scale experiments (microfluidics). A conceptual design of a periodic porous structure with regularly positioned solid cylinders is set up as a benchmark problem and treated with all considered methods. The results are discussed with regard to the individual strengths and limitations of the used methods. The applicable homogenisation approaches as well as all considered pore-scale models prove their ability to predict the permeability of the benchmark problem. The underestimation obtained by the microfluidic experiments is analysed in detail using the lattice Boltzmann method, which makes it possible to quantify the influence of experimental setup restrictions.en
dc.description.sponsorshipDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaftde
dc.description.sponsorshipProjekt DEALde
dc.identifier.issn0169-3913
dc.identifier.issn1573-1634
dc.identifier.other1845646479
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-ds-130371de
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/13037
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-13018
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.uridoi:10.1007/s11242-021-01586-2de
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
dc.subject.ddc620de
dc.titlePermeability estimation of regular porous structures : a benchmark for comparison of methodsen
dc.typearticlede
ubs.fakultaetBau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaftende
ubs.fakultaetMathematik und Physikde
ubs.fakultaetFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.institutInstitut für Mechanik (Bauwesen)de
ubs.institutInstitut für Modellierung und Simulation Biomechanischer Systemede
ubs.institutInstitut für Wasser- und Umweltsystemmodellierungde
ubs.institutInstitut für Angewandte Analysis und numerische Simulationde
ubs.institutInstitut für Computerphysikde
ubs.institutFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.publikation.seiten1-23de
ubs.publikation.sourceTransport in porous media 138 (2021), S. 1-23de
ubs.publikation.typZeitschriftenartikelde

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s11242-021-01586-2.pdf
Size:
1.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.39 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: