Filippou, VasileiosBlickle, SvenjaBubrin, MartinaKaim, Wolfgang2024-08-212024-08-2120211521-37490044-23131899379053http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-ds-148685http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/14868http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-14849Reaction of [Ru(acac)2(MeCN)2], acac−=acetylacetonate, with N‐phenylcamphoriminoquinone (pciq) or the new N‐(2‐thiomethylphenyl)‐camphoriminoquinone (tciq) produces complexes [Ru(acac)2(pciq)] and [Ru(acac)2(tciq)] with N,O or N,S coordination and E or Z configuration at the C=N bond, respectively. Oxidation state assignments in comparison with classical iminoquinone ligands are based on structural data in connection with DFT calculations. Reversible oxidation yields complex ions [RuIII(acac)2(pciq)]+ and [RuIII(acac)2(tciq)]+ as characterized by EPR, IR and UV‐vis‐NIR spectroelectrochemistry.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/540article2023-11-14