Pross, TillmannRoßdeutscher, Antje (Hrsg.)2013-11-192016-03-312013-11-192016-03-31201339922503Xhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-87758http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/5741http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-5724Based on data from German -ung nominalizations, I argue that selection restriction tests are not suitable as linguistic tools for ontological disambiguation. Consequently, I question the significance of ontology as a starting point for linguistic theorizing. Instead, I argue for an underspecified account of the ontology of nominalizations, in which disambiguation looses its central role in the commerce with ambiguity.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSemantik , Syntax400Diskursrepräsentationstheorie , Syntax-Semantik Schnittstelle , Sublexikalische SemantikDiscourse Representation Theory , Syntax-Semantics Interface , Sub-lexicalSemanticsworkingPaper