Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-14075
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorAllgeier, Jonas-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Nicolás, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorErdal, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorNowak, Wolfgang-
dc.contributor.authorCirpka, Olaf A.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-15T13:13:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-15T13:13:52Z-
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2296-6463-
dc.identifier.other1883629128-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-ds-140947de
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/14094-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-14075-
dc.description.abstractSurface-water divides can be delineated by analyzing digital elevation models. They might, however, significantly differ from groundwater divides because the groundwater surface does not necessarily follow the surface topography. Thus, in order to delineate a groundwater divide, hydraulic-head measurements are needed. Because installing piezometers is cost- and labor-intensive, it is vital to optimize their placement. In this work, we introduce an optimal design analysis that can identify the best spatial configuration of piezometers. The method is based on formal minimization of the expected posterior uncertainty in localizing the groundwater divide. It is based on the preposterior data impact assessor, a Bayesian framework that uses a random sample of models (here: steady-state groundwater flow models) in a fully non-linear analysis. For each realization, we compute virtual hydraulic-head measurements at all potential well installation points and delineate the groundwater divide by particle tracking. Then, for each set of virtual measurements and their possible measurement values, we assess the uncertainty of the groundwater-divide location after Bayesian updating, and finally marginalize over all possible measurement values. We test the method mimicking an aquifer in South-West Germany. Previous works in this aquifer indicated a groundwater divide that substantially differs from the surface-water divide. Our analysis shows that the uncertainty in the localization of the groundwater divide can be reduced with each additional monitoring well. In our case study, the optimal configuration of three monitoring points involves the first well being close to the topographic surface water divide, the second one on the hillslope toward the valley, and the third one in between.en
dc.description.sponsorshipGerman Research Foundationde
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.uridoi:10.3389/feart.2020.554845de
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
dc.subject.ddc624de
dc.titleA stochastic framework to optimize monitoring strategies for delineating groundwater dividesen
dc.typearticlede
dc.date.updated2023-11-14T05:53:32Z-
ubs.fakultaetBau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaftende
ubs.fakultaetFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.institutInstitut für Wasser- und Umweltsystemmodellierungde
ubs.institutFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.publikation.seiten22de
ubs.publikation.sourceFrontiers in earth science 8 (2020), No. 554845de
ubs.publikation.typZeitschriftenartikelde
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:02 Fakultät Bau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaften

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
feart-08-554845.pdf3,77 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons