Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-3485
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorMéndez Fernández, Danielde
dc.contributor.authorOgnawala, Saahilde
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Stefande
dc.contributor.authorDaneva, Mayade
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-25de
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-31T08:02:03Z-
dc.date.available2015-03-25de
dc.date.available2016-03-31T08:02:03Z-
dc.date.issued2014de
dc.identifier.other428243029de
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-99180de
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/3502-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-3485-
dc.description.abstractRequirements engineering process improvement (REPI) approaches have gained much attention in research and practice. So far, however, there is no comprehensive view on the research in REPI in terms of solutions and current state of reported evidence. This paper aims to provide an overview on the existing solutions, their underlying principles and their research type facets, i.e. their state of empirical evidence. To this end, we conducted a systematic mapping study of the REPI publication space. This paper reports on the first findings regarding research type facets of the contributions as well as selected methodological principles. We found a strong focus in the existing research on solution proposals for REPI approaches that concentrate on normative assessments and benchmarks of the RE activities rather than on holistic RE improvements according to individual goals of companies. We conclude, so far, that there is a need to broaden the work and to investigate more problem-driven REPI which also targets the improvement of the quality of the underlying RE artefacts.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde
dc.subject.classificationRequirements engineering , Empiriede
dc.subject.ddc004de
dc.subject.otherAnforderungsanalyse , Prozessverbesserung , Systematische Mapping-Studiede
dc.subject.otherRequirements Engineering , Process Improvement , Systematic Mapping Studyen
dc.titleWhere do we stand in requirements engineering improvement today? : first results from a mapping studyen
dc.typeconferenceObjectde
ubs.bemerkung.externThis is the authors' preprint. The copyright is held by ACM.de
ubs.fakultaetFakultät Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnikde
ubs.fakultaetFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.institutInstitut für Softwaretechnologiede
ubs.institutSonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.opusid9918de
ubs.publikation.sourceACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM'14)de
ubs.publikation.typKonferenzbeitragde
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:05 Fakultät Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
esem.pdf250,12 kBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repositorium sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.