14 Externe wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/15

Browse

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Abschlussbericht RABus (Phase 1) : Reallabor für den Automatisierten Busbetrieb im ÖPNV in der Stadt und auf dem Land
    (Stuttgart : Forschungsinstitut für Kraftfahrwesen und Fahrzeugmotoren Stuttgart (FKFS), 2025) Weinrich, Ulrike; Linnig, Magdalena; Kufky, Jonas; Grafl, Katherina; Pekyürek, Abdurrahman; Kagerbauer, Martin; Klinkhardt, Christian; Kandler, Kim; Wirkert, Sebastian; Banholzer , Matthias; Kaes , Christian; Hölbing , Enrico; Scheu , Jonathan; Frischmann , Michael
    Im Projekt „RABus - Reallabor für den Automatisierten Busbetrieb im ÖPNV in der Stadt und auf dem Land“ wurden von 2020 bis 2023 die technischen, organisatorischen und gesellschaftlichen Voraussetzungen für den Einsatz automatisierter Kleinbusse im öffentlichen Nahverkehr untersucht. Ziel war es, automatisierte Fahrzeuge mit einem angestrebten Funktionsumfang nach SAE-Level 4 unter realen Bedingungen zu entwickeln, zu erproben und in bestehende Verkehrssysteme zu integrieren. In zwei Reallaboren - Friedrichshafen und Mannheim - wurden dafür unterschiedliche städtische Strukturen betrachtet. Das Projekt umfasste neben der technischen Entwicklung und Erprobung auch infrastrukturelle Anpassungen, rechtliche Bewertungen, Maßnahmen zur Akzeptanzförderung sowie eine wissenschaftliche Begleitforschung zu verkehrlichen Wirkungen und Nutzerverhalten. Der vorliegende Bericht dokumentiert die zentralen Erkenntnisse aus Phase 1 und bildet damit die Grundlage für die weitere Projektarbeit.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Integrated multidimensional sustainability assessment of energy system transformation pathways
    (2021) Naegler, Tobias; Becker, Lisa; Buchgeister, Jens; Hauser, Wolfgang; Hottenroth, Heidi; Junne, Tobias; Lehr, Ulrike; Scheel, Oliver; Schmidt-Scheele, Ricarda; Simon, Sonja; Sutardhio, Claudia; Tietze, Ingela; Ulrich, Philip; Viere, Tobias; Weidlich, Anke
    Sustainable development embraces a broad spectrum of social, economic and ecological aspects. Thus, a sustainable transformation process of energy systems is inevitably multidimensional and needs to go beyond climate impact and cost considerations. An approach for an integrated and interdisciplinary sustainability assessment of energy system transformation pathways is presented here. It first integrates energy system modeling with a multidimensional impact assessment that focuses on life cycle-based environmental and macroeconomic impacts. Then, stakeholders’ preferences with respect to defined sustainability indicators are inquired, which are finally integrated into a comparative scenario evaluation through a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), all in one consistent assessment framework. As an illustrative example, this holistic approach is applied to the sustainability assessment of ten different transformation strategies for Germany. Applying multi-criteria decision analysis reveals that both ambitious (80%) and highly ambitious (95%) carbon reduction scenarios can achieve top sustainability ranks, depending on the underlying energy transformation pathways and respective scores in other sustainability dimensions. Furthermore, this research highlights an increasingly dominant contribution of energy systems’ upstream chains on total environmental impacts, reveals rather small differences in macroeconomic effects between different scenarios and identifies the transition among societal segments and climate impact minimization as the most important stakeholder preferences.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Storage technologies for the electricity transition : an analysis of actors, actor perspectives and transition pathways in Germany
    (2020) Frey, Ulrich J.; Wassermann, Sandra; Deissenroth-Uhrig, Marc
    This article analyses actors in the storage niche during the German electricity transition. Thus, we develop a more differentiated understanding of actors and their storage activities. For that, we employ the analytical multi-level-perspective (MLP) framework to focus on interactions between old and new storage technologies. Using data from expert interviews, we investigate whether the storage pathway resembles any of the four ideal types of transition pathways for interactions between niche and regime. Through our interviews, we identify five types of actor in the storage market: Big 4 (EnBW, RWE, E.ON, Vattenfall), project developers, innovative municipal utilities, small rural municipal utilities and independent green electricity providers. For each actor, we analyse four main aspects (1) previous orientation and motivation, (2) structural strategies, (3) institutional strategies, and (4) product-related strategies. Parallel to the classification of actors, we also classify available storage technologies according to their primary field of application. We conclude that interactions between regime and niche actors are cooperative, but weak, and no specific actor type currently dominates the niche activities. Hence, applications in the storage niche are not yet ready for a larger market. In sum, our results point to a future system that is characterized by reconfiguration, not substitution or transformation of current market actors.