Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-12734
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorKopfmüller, Jürgen-
dc.contributor.authorWeimer-Jehle, Wolfgang-
dc.contributor.authorNaegler, Tobias-
dc.contributor.authorBuchgeister, Jens-
dc.contributor.authorBräutigam, Klaus-Rainer-
dc.contributor.authorStelzer, Volker-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T13:01:13Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-20T13:01:13Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073-
dc.identifier.other1837714398-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-ds-127535de
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/12753-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-12734-
dc.description.abstractEnergy scenarios represent a prominent tool to support energy system transitions towards sustainability. In order to better fulfil this role, two elements are widely missing in previous work on designing, analyzing, and using scenarios: First, a more systematic integration of social and socio-technical characteristics of energy systems in scenario design, and, second, a method to apply an accordingly enhanced set of indicators in scenario assessment. In this article, an integrative scenario assessment methodology is introduced that combines these two requirements. It consists of: (i) A model-based scenario analysis using techno-economic and ecological indicators; (ii) a non-model-based analysis using socio-technical indicators; (iii) an assessment of scenario performances with respect to pre-determined indicator targets; (iv) a normalization method to make the two types of results (model-based and non-model-based) comparable; (v) an approach to classify results to facilitate structured interpretation. The combination of these elements represents the added-value of this methodology. It is illustrated for selected indicators, and exemplary results are presented. Methodological challenges and remaining questions, e.g., regarding the analysis of non-model-based indicators, resource requirements, or the robustness of the methodology are pointed out and discussed. We consider this integrative methodology being a substantial improvement of previous scenario assessment methodologies.en
dc.description.sponsorshipHelmholtz-Gemeinschaftde
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.uridoi:10.3390/en14061580de
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
dc.subject.ddc333.7de
dc.titleIntegrative scenario assessment as a tool to support decisions in energy transitionen
dc.typearticlede
dc.date.updated2021-04-09T04:38:44Z-
ubs.fakultaetFakultäts- und hochschulübergreifende Einrichtungende
ubs.fakultaetExterne wissenschaftliche Einrichtungende
ubs.fakultaetFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.institutZentrum für Interdisziplinäre Risiko- und Innovationsforschung der Universität Stuttgart (ZIRIUS)de
ubs.institutDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR)de
ubs.institutFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.publikation.seiten34de
ubs.publikation.sourceEnergies 14 (2021), No. 1580de
ubs.publikation.typZeitschriftenartikelde
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:11 Interfakultäre Einrichtungen

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
energies-14-01580-v3.pdf8,3 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons