Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-13350
Autor(en): Full, Johannes
Hohmann, Silja
Ziehn, Sonja
Gamero, Edgar
Schließ, Tobias
Schmid, Hans-Peter
Miehe, Robert
Sauer, Alexander
Titel: Perspectives of biogas plants as BECCS facilities : a comparative analysis of biomethane vs. biohydrogen production with carbon capture and storage or use (CCS/CCU)
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Dokumentart: Zeitschriftenartikel
Seiten: 16
Erschienen in: Energies 16 (2023), No. 5066
URI: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-ds-133691
http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/13369
http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-13350
ISSN: 1996-1073
Zusammenfassung: The transition to a carbon-neutral economy requires innovative solutions that reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and promote sustainable energy production. Additionally, carbon dioxide removal technologies are urgently needed. The production of biomethane or biohydrogen with carbon dioxide capture and storage are two promising BECCS approaches to achieve these goals. In this study, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches regarding their technical, economic, and environmental performance. Our analysis shows that while both approaches have the potential to reduce GHG emissions and increase energy security, the hydrogen-production approach has several advantages, including up to five times higher carbon dioxide removal potential. However, the hydrogen bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (HyBECCS) approach also faces some challenges, such as higher capital costs, the need for additional infrastructure, and lower energy efficiency. Our results give valuable insights into the trade-offs between these two approaches. They can inform decision-makers regarding the most suitable method for reducing GHG emissions and provide renewable energy in different settings.
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:04 Fakultät Energie-, Verfahrens- und Biotechnik

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
energies-16-05066.pdf1,34 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons