Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-14537
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorWetzel, Anna-Jasmin-
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Roland-
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Nadine-
dc.contributor.authorKlemmt, Malte-
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Regina-
dc.contributor.authorPreiser, Christine-
dc.contributor.authorRieger, Monika-
dc.contributor.authorRösel, Inka-
dc.contributor.authorRanisch, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorEhni, Hans-Jörg-
dc.contributor.authorJoos, Stefanie-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-17T13:25:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-17T13:25:31Z-
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2055-2076-
dc.identifier.other1892151332-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-ds-145564de
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/14556-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-14537-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Symptom checker apps (SCAs) offer symptom classification and low-threshold self-triage for laypeople. They are already in use despite their poor accuracy and concerns that they may negatively affect primary care. This study assesses the extent to which SCAs are used by medical laypeople in Germany and which software is most popular. We examined associations between satisfaction with the general practitioner (GP) and SCA use as well as the number of GP visits and SCA use. Furthermore, we assessed the reasons for intentional non-use. Methods: We conducted a survey comprising standardised and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were weighted, and open-ended responses were examined using thematic analysis. Results: This study included 850 participants. The SCA usage rate was 8%, and approximately 50% of SCA non-users were uninterested in trying SCAs. The most commonly used SCAs were NetDoktor and Ada. Surprisingly, SCAs were most frequently used in the age group of 51–55 years. No significant associations were found between SCA usage and satisfaction with the GP or the number of GP visits and SCA usage. Thematic analysis revealed skepticism regarding the results and recommendations of SCAs and discrepancies between users’ requirements and the features of apps. Conclusion: SCAs are still widely unknown in the German population and have been sparsely used so far. Many participants were not interested in trying SCAs, and we found no positive or negative associations of SCAs and primary care.en
dc.description.sponsorshipGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Researchde
dc.description.sponsorshipEmployers' Association of the Metal and Electric Industry Baden-Württemberg (Südwestmetall)de
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.uridoi:10.1177/20552076241231555de
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
dc.subject.ddc004de
dc.subject.ddc610de
dc.title‘Better see a doctor?’ status quo of symptom checker apps in Germany : a cross-sectional survey with a mixed-methods design (CHECK.APP)en
dc.typearticlede
dc.date.updated2024-04-25T13:23:04Z-
ubs.fakultaetInformatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnikde
ubs.fakultaetFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.institutInstitut für Software Engineeringde
ubs.institutFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.publikation.seiten11de
ubs.publikation.sourceDigital health 10 (2024), No. 20552076241231555de
ubs.publikation.typZeitschriftenartikelde
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:05 Fakultät Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
10.1177_20552076241231555.pdf1,25 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons