Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-5334
Authors: Hentschel, Klaus
Title: Philosophical interpretations of relativity theory : 1910 - 1930
Issue Date: 1990
metadata.ubs.publikation.typ: Konferenzbeitrag
metadata.ubs.publikation.source: PSA : Proceedings of the biennial meeting / Philosophy of Science Association. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1990, Vol. 2, S. 169-179. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/193066
URI: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-51146
http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/5351
http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-5334
Abstract: The paper (given in the section on "Recent work in the History of Philosophy of Science) discusses the method and some of the results of the doctoral dissertation on philosophical interpretations of Einstein's special and general theories of relativity, submitted to the Dept. for History of Science, Univ. of Hamburg, in 1989, also published by Birkhauser, Basel, in 1990. It is claimed that many of the gross oversimplifications, misunderstandings and misinterpretations occurring in more than 2500 texts about the theories of relativity written by scientists, philosophers, and laymen contemporary to Einstein can in fact serve as a clue to a better understanding of the general process by which philosophical interpretations are formed. Another very important source for answering the question of how misinterpretations are formed are hitherto unpublished documents in the estates of physicists and philosophers of that time, including apart from Einstein himself: Bergson, Bridgman, Carnap, Cassirer, Metz, Meyerson, Petzoldt, Reichenbach, Schlick and Vaihinger.
Appears in Collections:09 Philosophisch-historische Fakultät

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hen6.pdf392,14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OPUS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.