Building consensus for Ada 9X
| dc.contributor.author | Plödereder, Erhard | de |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-28 | de |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-31T07:59:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-06-28 | de |
| dc.date.available | 2016-03-31T07:59:03Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1992 | de |
| dc.description.abstract | Language design is a most difficult task. While the original design of a language has the distinct advantage of filling a blank page, the revision of a language needs to abide by a number of constraints that limit the degree of design freedom. These constraints are both of a technical and a nontechnical nature. In a language revision, each desired change has both a benefit and a cost. Deciding which changes to incorporate into the language becomes a cost/benefit analysis within the framework of the existing constraints. In this article, we will explore some of these constraints and their impact on the Ada 9X revision process. | en |
| dc.identifier.other | 350152934 | de |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-63457 | de |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/2718 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-2701 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | de |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | de |
| dc.subject.classification | ADA , Programmiersprache | de |
| dc.subject.ddc | 620 | de |
| dc.title | Building consensus for Ada 9X | en |
| dc.type | article | de |
| ubs.fakultaet | Fakultät Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik | de |
| ubs.institut | Institut für Softwaretechnologie | de |
| ubs.opusid | 6345 | de |
| ubs.publikation.source | Communications of the ACM 35 (1992), Nr. 11, S. 85-88. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/138844.138852 | de |
| ubs.publikation.typ | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |