06 Fakultät Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik und Geodäsie
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/7
Browse
5 results
Search Results
Item Open Access Geospatial information research : state of the art, case studies and future perspectives(2022) Bill, Ralf; Blankenbach, Jörg; Breunig, Martin; Haunert, Jan-Henrik; Heipke, Christian; Herle, Stefan; Maas, Hans-Gerd; Mayer, Helmut; Meng, Liqui; Rottensteiner, Franz; Schiewe, Jochen; Sester, Monika; Sörgel, Uwe; Werner, MartinGeospatial information science (GI science) is concerned with the development and application of geodetic and information science methods for modeling, acquiring, sharing, managing, exploring, analyzing, synthesizing, visualizing, and evaluating data on spatio-temporal phenomena related to the Earth. As an interdisciplinary scientific discipline, it focuses on developing and adapting information technologies to understand processes on the Earth and human-place interactions, to detect and predict trends and patterns in the observed data, and to support decision making. The authors - members of DGK, the Geoinformatics division, as part of the Committee on Geodesy of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities, representing geodetic research and university teaching in Germany - have prepared this paper as a means to point out future research questions and directions in geospatial information science. For the different facets of geospatial information science, the state of art is presented and underlined with mostly own case studies. The paper thus illustrates which contributions the German GI community makes and which research perspectives arise in geospatial information science. The paper further demonstrates that GI science, with its expertise in data acquisition and interpretation, information modeling and management, integration, decision support, visualization, and dissemination, can help solve many of the grand challenges facing society today and in the future.Item Open Access ML meets aerospace : challenges of certifying airborne AI(2024) Luettig, Bastian; Akhiat, Yassine; Daw, ZamiraArtificial Intelligence (AI) technologies can potentially revolutionize the aerospace industry with applications such as remote sensing data refinement, autonomous landing, and drone-based agriculture. However, safety concerns have prevented the widespread adoption of AI in commercial aviation. Currently, commercial aircraft do not incorporate AI components, even in entertainment or ground systems. This paper explores the intersection of AI and aerospace, focusing on the challenges of certifying AI for airborne use, which may require a new certification approach. We conducted a comprehensive literature review to identify common AI-enabled aerospace applications, classifying them by the criticality of the application and the complexity of the AI method. An applicability analysis was conducted to assess how existing aerospace standards - for system safety, software, and hardware - apply to machine learning technologies. In addition, we conducted a gap analysis of machine learning development methodologies to meet the stringent aspects of aviation certification. We evaluate current efforts in AI certification by applying the EASA concept paper and Overarching Properties (OPs) to a case study of an automated peripheral detection system (ADIMA). Aerospace applications are expected to use a range of methods tailored to different levels of criticality. Current aerospace standards are not directly applicable due to the manner in which the behavior is specified by the data, the uncertainty of the models, and the limitations of white box verification. From a machine learning perspective, open research questions were identified that address validation of intent and data-driven requirements, sufficiency of verification, uncertainty quantification, generalization, and mitigation of unintended behavior. For the ADIMA system, we demonstrated compliance with EASA development processes and achieved key certification objectives. However, many of the objectives are not applicable due to the human-centric design. OPs helped us to identify and uncover several defeaters in the applied ML technology. The results highlight the need for updated certification standards that take into account the unique nature of AI and its failure types. Furthermore, certification processes need to support the continuous evolution of AI technologies. Key challenges remain in ensuring the safety and reliability of AI systems, which calls for new methodologies in the machine learning community.Item Open Access Detection, analysis, and removal of glitches from InSight's seismic data from Mars(2020) Scholz, John‐Robert; Widmer‐Schnidrig, Rudolf; Davis, Paul; Lognonné, Philippe; Pinot, Baptiste; Garcia, Raphaël F.; Hurst, Kenneth; Pou, Laurent; Nimmo, Francis; Barkaoui, Salma; de Raucourt, Sébastien; Knapmeyer‐Endrun, Brigitte; Knapmeyer, Martin; Orhand‐Mainsant, Guénolé; Compaire, Nicolas; Cuvier, Arthur; Beucler, Éric; Bonnin, Mickaël; Joshi, Rakshit; Sainton, Grégory; Stutzmann, Eléonore; Schimmel, Martin; Horleston, Anna; Böse, Maren; Ceylan, Savas; Clinton, John; Driel, Martin van; Kawamura, Taichi; Khan, Amir; Stähler, Simon C.; Giardini, Domenico; Charalambous, Constantinos; Stott, Alexander E.; Pike, William T.; Christensen, Ulrich R.; Banerdt, W. BruceThe instrument package SEIS (Seismic Experiment for Internal Structure) with the three very broadband and three short‐period seismic sensors is installed on the surface on Mars as part of NASA's InSight Discovery mission. When compared to terrestrial installations, SEIS is deployed in a very harsh wind and temperature environment that leads to inevitable degradation of the quality of the recorded data. One ubiquitous artifact in the raw data is an abundance of transient one‐sided pulses often accompanied by high‐frequency spikes. These pulses, which we term “glitches”, can be modeled as the response of the instrument to a step in acceleration, while the spikes can be modeled as the response to a simultaneous step in displacement. We attribute the glitches primarily to SEIS‐internal stress relaxations caused by the large temperature variations to which the instrument is exposed during a Martian day. Only a small fraction of glitches correspond to a motion of the SEIS package as a whole caused by minuscule tilts of either the instrument or the ground. In this study, we focus on the analysis of the glitch+spike phenomenon and present how these signals can be automatically detected and removed from SEIS's raw data. As glitches affect many standard seismological analysis methods such as receiver functions, spectral decomposition and source inversions, we anticipate that studies of the Martian seismicity as well as studies of Mars' internal structure should benefit from deglitched seismic data.Item Open Access Concept and performance evaluation of a novel UAV-borne topo-bathymetric LiDAR sensor(2020) Mandlburger, Gottfried; Pfennigbauer, Martin; Schwarz, Roland; Flöry, Sebastian; Nussbaumer, LukasWe present the sensor concept and first performance and accuracy assessment results of a novel lightweight topo-bathymetric laser scanner designed for integration on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), light aircraft, and helicopters. The instrument is particularly well suited for capturing river bathymetry in high spatial resolution as a consequence of (i) the low nominal flying altitude of 50-150 m above ground level resulting in a laser footprint diameter on the ground of typically 10-30 cm and (ii) the high pulse repetition rate of up to 200 kHz yielding a point density on the ground of approximately 20-50 points/m2. The instrument features online waveform processing and additionally stores the full waveform within the entire range gate for waveform analysis in post-processing. The sensor was tested in a real-world environment by acquiring data from two freshwater ponds and a 500 m section of the pre-Alpine Pielach River (Lower Austria). The captured underwater points featured a maximum penetration of two times the Secchi depth. On dry land, the 3D point clouds exhibited (i) a measurement noise in the range of 1-3 mm; (ii) a fitting precision of redundantly captured flight strips of 1 cm; and (iii) an absolute accuracy of 2-3 cm compared to terrestrially surveyed checkerboard targets. A comparison of the refraction corrected LiDAR point cloud with independent underwater checkpoints exhibited a maximum deviation of 7.8 cm and revealed a systematic depth-dependent error when using a refraction coefficient of n = 1.36 for time-of-flight correction. The bias is attributed to multi-path effects in the turbid water column (Secchi depth: 1.1 m) caused by forward scattering of the laser signal at suspended particles. Due to the high spatial resolution, good depth performance, and accuracy, the sensor shows a high potential for applications in hydrology, fluvial morphology, and hydraulic engineering, including flood simulation, sediment transport modeling, and habitat mapping.Item Open Access Building a fully-automatized active learning framework for the semantic segmentation of geospatial 3D point clouds(2024) Kölle, Michael; Walter, Volker; Sörgel, UweIn recent years, significant progress has been made in developing supervised Machine Learning (ML) systems like Convolutional Neural Networks. However, it’s crucial to recognize that the performance of these systems heavily relies on the quality of labeled training data. To address this, we propose a shift in focus towards developing sustainable methods of acquiring such data instead of solely building new classifiers in the ever-evolving ML field. Specifically, in the geospatial domain, the process of generating training data for ML systems has been largely neglected in research. Traditionally, experts have been burdened with the laborious task of labeling, which is not only time-consuming but also inefficient. In our system for the semantic interpretation of Airborne Laser Scanning point clouds, we break with this convention and completely remove labeling obligations from domain experts who have completed special training in geosciences and instead adopt a hybrid intelligence approach. This involves active and iterative collaboration between the ML model and humans through Active Learning, which identifies the most critical samples justifying manual inspection. Only these samples (typically ≪1%of Passive Learning training points) are subject to human annotation. To carry out this annotation, we choose to outsource the task to a large group of non-specialists, referred to as the crowd, which comes with the inherent challenge of guiding those inexperienced annotators (i.e., “short-term employees”) to still produce labels of sufficient quality. However, we acknowledge that attracting enough volunteers for crowdsourcing campaigns can be challenging due to the tedious nature of labeling tasks. To address this, we propose employing paid crowdsourcing and providing monetary incentives to crowdworkers. This approach ensures access to a vast pool of prospective workers through respective platforms, ensuring timely completion of jobs. Effectively, crowdworkers become human processing units in our hybrid intelligence system mirroring the functionality of electronic processing units .