01 Fakultät Architektur und Stadtplanung
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/2
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Open Access Der Architekt Bodo Rasch : sein Leben und Werk(2023) Stolz, Katharina; Philipp, Klaus Jan (Prof. Dr. phil. habil.)Die vorliegende Arbeit widmet sich monografisch dem architektonischen Autodidakten Bodo Rasch (1903-1995), der seit seinem Studium zum Agraringenieur in Hohenheim ab 1923 bis zu seinem Tod 1995 in Stuttgart lebte und der sich in der hiesigen Architekturszene sehr engagierte. Die Dissertationsschrift stellt nun erstmals die Person und das Œuvre Bodo Raschs, unabhängig von dessen älterem Bruder Heinz (1902-1996) vor und widmet sich mit dessen wissenschaftlicher Aufarbeitung und Kontextualisierung einem Forschungsdesiderat. Entgegen der vorherrschenden Fachmeinung war Bodo Rasch nach der Auflösung des mit seinem Bruder Heinz gemeinsam geführten Bauateliers nicht nur als Journalist und Herausgeber tätig. Vielmehr konnten durch die Aufarbeitung der Nachlassunterlagen bisher in der Fachliteratur unkorrekt beiden Brüdern zugeschriebene Projekte allein auf Bodo Rasch zurückgeführt werden, dazu gehören insbesondere die pneumatischen Konstruktionen und die Containerarchitektur. Durch die vorliegende Arbeit wird nun deutlich, dass sich Rasch auf zahlreichen unterschiedlichen architektonischen Gebieten engagierte und profiliere und wichtige Beiträge zu deren Entwicklung leistete, die bis dato keinen Niederschlag in der Fachliteratur fanden, wodurch ihm ein Platz in der Reihe der Vordenker und Wegbereiter bislang verwehrt blieb. Des Weiteren liefert die Arbeit auf der Basis der Monografie Raschs einen Beitrag zur historischen Erforschung der Netzwerke von Ingenieuren, Architekten und Planern der Stuttgarter Region, während und nach der Zeit der NS-Herrschaft.Item Open Access Johann Wendelin Braunwald : Werkverzeichnis zum Gedenken an einen vergessenen Stuttgarter Architekten(2022) Volk, Simon OttoDas Werkverzeichnis des Architekten Braunwald ist in Form einer Faltkarte gestaltet. Auf der Vorderseite sind seine Stuttgarter Bauwerke in einem Stadtplan verortet, rückseitig werden einige von ihnen in historischen Ansichts-Zeichnungen portraitiert.Item Open Access Learning modern architecture in Seoul : city reconstruction and megastructure during the Cold War compared to cases in West Germany(2024) Lee, Dasol; Philipp, Klaus Jan (Prof. Dr. phil. habil.)In the late 1960s, due to the lack of urban infrastructure, a number of modern megastructures were built in Seoul. However, the perception of South Korean architecture which built in this time is generally negative. Moreover, these buildings are also alienated and largely omitted from the history of world architecture. This thesis is intended to reveal that these buildings exemplified the contemporaneity of modern architecture at the time. To prove this, this study chose subjects such as megastructures, particularly commercial apartments, built in the late 1960s. And West German cases were selected as a basis for comparison. The reason is the commonality of the urban histories of Korea and Germany. First, in the 1960s, both Korea and Germany urgently needed post-war reconstruction. Second, they were divided. In the late 1960s, both Korea and West Germany experienced extraordinary shifts in political and geographical positions during the Cold War era. This was a factor that clearly influenced architecture at the time. The study begins by exploring the description of global architectural history and architectural background from various angles. After that, it analyzes the urban environment in West Germany (BRD) and the urban situation in Seoul. Finally, it describes the process of transplanting the modern architecture of the 1960s to Korea and analyzes the cases of megastructures born as a result. The cases are Sewoon Shopping Center, Nakwon Shopping Center, Schlangenbader Straße Autobahnüberbauung, and Mundsburg Center and Tower. As a result of the analysis, all of these cases were born from the concept of contemporary megastructure and played the same role in the city. The differences between architectural technology, capital, and architectural processes originated from the differences between the architectural environments of Korea and Germany. At the time, Korea was in the nascent stage of learning and experimenting with modern architecture, while Germany was leading the implementation of modern architecture and was at the forefront of developing technology. In conclusion, it can be said that modern architecture played a central role in post-war Korea in the 1960s. Modern architecture, which entered Korea during this period, expanded upon the traditional architecture layer. Korean architects designed the megastructure as an experiment to apply the newly learned modern architectural concept within Korean tradition and aesthetics. Of course, the comparative cases in this paper are limited. However, it is meaningful that the results of Korean architects' participation in the modern architecture flow at the time were objectively confirmed through the comparison of the cases of Germany, the origin of the modern architecture concept. In addition, it is expected that this paper will serve as a starting point for a broader and more diverse comparative analysis of Korean and world architecture in the future.Item Open Access The exchange of ideas between the Western and Eastern European city : an exploratory analysis based on the research on Stuttgart and Plovdiv(2023) Guirguinova, Radoslava; Philipp, Klaus Jan (Prof. Dr. phil. habil.)When studying the current research on the development of the Western and Eastern European city, we can observe a notion of a meandering relationship between the two urban models ranging from common beginnings, through different political and ideological metamorphoses towards a likely repeated approximation since 1989. The conflict between the inclusivity of this ideological premise and the perceived existing economic, political, cultural and psychological gap between the East and West motivates the research questions of the present doctoral thesis. It proposes a modified research approach to the study of the idea exchange and its influence on the built environment by performing a comparative analysis of the historical development of both contexts likened to the general European tendencies, exemplified through the observation of the case study cities Stuttgart and Plovdiv. The methodology of the project combines analytical methods from architectural history and theory, as well as semiotics, enabling the comprehensive analysis of the interaction between idea exchange and the urban transformation of European cities. Architectural history and theory methods are used in the longitudinal historical analysis of the urban transformation of Eastern and Western European cities. Simultaneously, the methodological principles of semiotics are implemented, when interpreting the built environment as a complex sign system, a physical message and product of the idea exchange between different cultural contexts. The material structure of the city is recognized as a testimony for the examined phenomena and systematically studied in the four aspects of urban morphology, the treatment of architectural monuments, the represented architectural styles and the resulting quality of urban space. The study of both urban contexts in relation to the general European tendencies and the role of idea exchange along the East – West axis conducted in the three parts of the thesis allows us to formulate an analytical frame regarding the operating principles of cultural dialogue and its influence on urban transformation. This approach classifies the operating principles in boundary factors, main actors, channels and forms of exchange, while creating guidelines for the further study. Subsequently, the initial analytical frame is refined and expanded to a hypothesis regarding the future development of European cities. The research objective shifts from the focus on the relationship between cultural dialogue and the built environment in the research on the historical period 1750 - 1989 to the study of the interaction between ongoing idea exchange, the developing civil society and the resulting transformation of the cityscape in the analysis of the period since 1989. It further expands to the interdependency between cultural dialogue, civil society, the professional guild and the built environment following the study of current phenomena, reflecting the central role and responsibility of architects and urban planners in ensuring the sustainable transformation of European cities.