07 Fakultät Konstruktions-, Produktions- und Fahrzeugtechnik

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/8

Browse

Filters

2019 - 201912020 - 20231

Settings

Institute: search.filters.UBSInstitut.Institut für Systemtheorie und RegelungstechnikAuthor: search.filters.author.Pleiss, Jürgen

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Modeling of biocatalytic reactions: a workflow for model calibration, selection, and validation using Bayesian statistics
    (2019) Eisenkolb, Ina; Jensch, Antje; Eisenkolb, Kerstin; Kramer, Andrei; Buchholz, Patrick C. F.; Pleiss, Jürgen; Spiess, Antje; Radde, Nicole
    We present a workflow for kinetic modeling of biocatalytic reactions which combines methods from Bayesian learning and uncertainty quantification for model calibration, model selection, evaluation, and model reduction in a consistent statistical frame-work. Our workflow is particularly tailored to sparse data settings in which a considerable variability of the parameters remains after the models have been adapted to available data, a ubiquitous problem in many real-world applications. Our workflow is exemplified on an enzyme-catalyzed two-substrate reaction mechanism describing the symmetric carboligation of 3,5-dimethoxy-benzaldehyde to (R)-3,3',5,5'-tetramethoxybenzoin catalyzed by benzaldehyde lyase from Pseudomonas fluorescens. Results indicate a substrate-dependent inactivation of enzyme, which is in accordance with other recent studies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Bayesian estimation reveals that reproducible models in systems biology get more citations
    (2023) Höpfl, Sebastian; Pleiss, Jürgen; Radde, Nicole E.
    The Systems Biology community has taken numerous actions to develop data and modeling standards towards FAIR data and model handling. Nevertheless, the debate about incentives and rewards for individual researchers to make their results reproducible is ongoing. Here, we pose the specific question of whether reproducible models have a higher impact in terms of citations. Therefore, we statistically analyze 328 published models recently classified by Tiwari et al. based on their reproducibility. For hypothesis testing, we use a flexible Bayesian approach that provides complete distributional information for all quantities of interest and can handle outliers. The results show that in the period from 2013, i.e., 10 years after the introduction of SBML, to 2020, the group of reproducible models is significantly more cited than the non-reproducible group. We show that differences in journal impact factors do not explain this effect and that this effect increases with additional standardization of data and error model integration via PEtab. Overall, our statistical analysis demonstrates the long-term merits of reproducible modeling for the individual researcher in terms of citations. Moreover, it provides evidence for the increased use of reproducible models in the scientific community.