Universität Stuttgart
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/1
Browse
Search Results
Item Open Access Comparison of Taguchi Method and Robust Design Optimization (RDO) : by application of a functional adaptive simulation model for the robust product-optimization of an adjuster unit(2015) Kemmler, Stefan; Fuchs, Alexander; Leopold, Tobias; Bertsche, BerndCurrent research and development have been trending towards approaches based on simulation and virtual testing. Industrial development processes for complex products employ optimization methods to ensure results are close to reality, simultaneously minimizing required resources. The results of virtual testing are optimized in accordance with requirements using optimization techniques. Robust Design Optimization (RDO) is one established approach to optimization. RDO is based on the identification of an optimal parameter set which includes a small variance of the target value as a constraint. Under most circumstances, this approach does not involve separate optimization of the target value and target variance. However, the basic strategy of the optimization approach developed by Taguchi is to first optimize the parameter sets for the target value and then optimize and minimize the target variance. According to an application example , the benefit of Taguchi's approach (TM) is that it facilitates the identification of an optimal parameter set of nominal values for technical feasibility and possible manufacturing. If an optimal parameter set is determined, the variance can be minimized under consideration of process parameters. This paper examines and discusses the differences between and shared characteristics of the robust optimization methods TM and RDO, and discusses their shortcomings. In order to provide a better illustration, this paper explains and applies both methods using an adjuster unit of a commercial vehicle braking system. A simulation model is developed including an appropriate work ow by applying optiSLang-modules.Item Open Access Robust Design Methodology for the development of commercial vehicle braking systems(2015) Kemmler, Stefan; Leopold, Tobias; Fricke, Jens; Bertsche, BerndToday’s product requirements demand an ever increasing functionality for the same space and usually the same number of components. Thereby, the quality, reliability and robustness of these products should be preserved or even be increased. This target conflict cannot be solved without compromises. The research community between the Institute of Machine Components (IMA), University of Stuttgart, and the Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH is seeking for new solutions for these challenges. The new approaches for designing robust and reliable products are being implemented directly in a current development project of an innovative Air Disc Brake (ADB). With “Systematic Method for Axiomatic Robustness-Testing” (SMART), reliability methods and the basic concept of Robust Design methodology are related to the Taguchi Method. SMART is based on three phases: System, Parameter and Tolerance Design; accordingly, the sample phases of VDA (Association of German Automotives) are used as milestones. In the System Design, SMART focuses on the decreasing complexity according to the functional dependences of the DPs, thus precluding early random failures. In the Parameter Design phase, SMART gives the developer an approach for modeling an adaptive simulation model (SIM-SMART). This model also enables the simulation of random and possible fatigue failures in addition to the nominally robust DPs. In the early stage of product development, reliability predictions are possible. In the iterative Tolerance Design phase, the final tolerance limits for robust and reliable products are defined with consideration of compromises in terms of costs, quality and technical feasibility. With the application of SMART, a design concept of a new generation of an ADB with less complexity is created. The extensive functions for flexible function studies are modeled with the objective of SIM-SMART. Accordingly to this model, parameter studies for determination of the nominal adjustment levels can be performed and their random and fatigue failures modeled. In conclusion, more accurate reliability test strategies are recommended using the definition of tolerance limits. The cost aspect and technical feasibility are also taken into account. So far, SMART has not been added to the iterative Tolerance Design phase. With this paper, the method is not only extended to this phase, but also sufficiently validated. In addition, SMART can predict and analyze random failures. With its three coherent and iterative phases, it is an as yet unpublished and unimplemented approach for designing even more robust and reliable products. Robust Design Methodology and reliability methods are fundamental building blocks for products with high quality requirements. SMART presents an approach to support the designing of robust, reliable, highly functional and innovative ADB.Item Open Access Robust reliability or reliable robustness? : integrated consideration of robustness- and reliability-aspects(2015) Kemmler, Stefan; Eifler, Tobias; Bertsche, Bernd; Howard, Thomas J.Commonly, the terms reliability and robustness are used to describe products and processes, which are in accordance with the customer requirements and fulfil high quality expectations. However, significant differences between the underlying definitions raise the questions how reliable robust products are and vice versa. For a comprehensive understanding and to use existing synergies between both domains, this paper discusses the basic principles of Reliability- and Robust Design theory. The development of a comprehensive model will enable an integrated consideration of both domains in the future, will offer guidance for a systematic choice of corresponding methods and is thus aiming to pave the way for future research.