Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-12665
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorFendel, Veronika-
dc.contributor.authorKranert, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorMaurer, Claudia-
dc.contributor.authorGarcés-Sánchez, Gabriela-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Jingjing-
dc.contributor.authorRamakrishna, Girija-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-19T13:13:00Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-19T13:13:00Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.issn2313-4321-
dc.identifier.other1832495949-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-ds-126843de
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/12684-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-12665-
dc.description.abstractAgricultural land degradation, urban migration, increasing food demand and waste, and inadequate sanitation systems all affect farmers, local society, and the environment in South India. Joint recycling of biodegradable secondary household resources to close nutrient cycles between urban and rural regions can address all these challenges and thus several SDGs at the same time. Efforts are being made to this end, but many attempts fail. The central research question is, therefore: how can co-recycling concepts be evaluated in this context? For this purpose, composting plants, biogas fermenters, and a high-tech concept to produce plant charcoal, design fertilizer, and biopolymers are considered. The aim of this study is to evaluate the recycling concepts from the stakeholders’ perspective to avoid gaps between theory and practice. Six expert and one focus group interviews on two successful on-site case studies and 15 online expert interviews with thematic actors were qualitatively evaluated and presented in a social network analysis to identify preferences and indicators for the further evaluation of co-recycling concepts. The results show that the focus is on mature technologies such as compost and biogas. High-tech solutions are currently still in rudimentary demand but will play a more important role in the future. To evaluate such concepts, seven key indicators and their measured values were identified and clustered into the categories ecological, social, technical, economic, and connective. The results show that this methodology of close interaction with stakeholders and the evaluation of successful regional case studies minimize the gap between practice and theory, contribute to several goals of the SDGs, and thus enable such concepts to be implemented sustainably.en
dc.description.sponsorshipIndo-German Centre for Sustainability (IGCS)de
dc.description.sponsorshipFederal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)de
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.uridoi:10.3390/recycling7040049de
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
dc.subject.ddc624de
dc.titleStakeholder assessment on closing nutrient cycles through co-recycling of biodegradable household kitchen waste and black water between rural and urban areas in South Indiaen
dc.typearticlede
dc.date.updated2022-08-03T15:15:45Z-
ubs.fakultaetBau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaftende
ubs.fakultaetFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.institutInstitut für Siedlungswasserbau, Wassergüte- und Abfallwirtschaftde
ubs.institutFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.publikation.seiten16de
ubs.publikation.sourceRecycling 7 (2022), No. 49de
ubs.publikation.typZeitschriftenartikelde
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:02 Fakultät Bau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaften

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
recycling-07-00049.pdf3,01 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons