Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-14165
Langanzeige der Metadaten
DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorFull, Johannes-
dc.contributor.authorZiehn, Sonja-
dc.contributor.authorGeller, Marcel-
dc.contributor.authorMiehe, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorSauer, Alexander-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-03T13:21:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-03T13:21:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn1757-1707-
dc.identifier.issn1757-1693-
dc.identifier.other1885367171-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-ds-141841de
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/14184-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-14165-
dc.description.abstractIn order to achieve greenhouse gas neutrality, hydrogen generated from renewable sources will play an important role. Additionally, as underlined in the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), new technologies to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere are required on a large scale. A novel concept for hydrogen production with net negative emissions referred to as HyBECCS (Hydrogen Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage) combines these two purposes in one technological approach. The HyBECCS concept combines biohydrogen production from biomass with the capture and storage of biogenic carbon dioxide. Various technology combinations of HyBECCS processes are possible, whose ecological effects and economic viability need to be analyzed in order to provide a basis for comparison and decision‐making. This paper presents fundamentals for the techno‐economic and environmental evaluation of HyBECCS approaches. Transferable frameworks on system boundaries as well as emission, cost, and revenue streams are defined and specifics for the application of existing assessment methods are elaborated. In addition, peculiarities concerning the HyBECCS approach with respect to political regulatory measures and interrelationships between economics and ecology are outlined. Based on these considerations, two key performance indicators (KPIs) are established, referred to as levelized cost of carbon‐negative hydrogen (LCCNH) and of negative emissions (LCNE). Both KPIs allow deciding whether a specific HyBECCS project is economically viable and allows its comparison with different hydrogen, energy provision, or negative emission technologies (NETs).en
dc.description.sponsorshipBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energiede
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Rural Affairs and Consumer Protection of Baden‐Wuerttemberg, Germanyde
dc.description.sponsorshipProjekt DEALde
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.uridoi:10.1111/gcbb.12932de
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
dc.subject.ddc333.7de
dc.titleCarbon‐negative hydrogen production : fundamentals for a techno‐economic and environmental assessment of HyBECCS approachesen
dc.typearticlede
dc.date.updated2023-11-14T02:06:20Z-
ubs.fakultaetEnergie-, Verfahrens- und Biotechnikde
ubs.fakultaetExterne wissenschaftliche Einrichtungende
ubs.institutInstitut für Energieeffizienz in der Produktionde
ubs.institutFraunhofer Institut für Produktionstechnik und Automatisierung (IPA)de
ubs.publikation.seiten597-619de
ubs.publikation.sourceGCB bioenergy 14 (2022), S. 597-619de
ubs.publikation.typZeitschriftenartikelde
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:04 Fakultät Energie-, Verfahrens- und Biotechnik

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
GCBB_GCBB12932.pdf1,44 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons