Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-7710
Authors: Hubig, Christoph
Title: Is it possible to apply the concept "interpretant" to diverging fields uniformly? : something about the relationship between semiotics as philosophy of science and semiotics of arts
Issue Date: 1981
metadata.ubs.publikation.typ: Konferenzbeitrag
metadata.ubs.publikation.source: Ketner, Kenneth L. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the C. S. Peirce Bicentennial International Congress. Lubbock, Tex. : Texas Tech. Pr., 1981 (Graduate studies / Texas Tech University 23). - ISBN 0-89672-074-8, S. 71-74
URI: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-66890
http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/7727
http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-7710
Abstract: The thesis of this paper is that the direct application of Peirce's semiotic to the arts has been based upon a number of misunderstandings. Two false assumptions have played a cardinal role. The first is that Peirce's semiotic represents a scientific method instead of representing a theory of a scientific method, which it actually is; in other words, it is a metatheory. The second and more crucial assumption concerns the application of the interpretant to science as opposed to the arts. Here it is overlooked that in science, interpretants carry the sole responsibility for the constitution of meaning, whereas in the arts, divergence from the interpretants upon which a work is based plays the decisive role.
Appears in Collections:15 Fakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtung

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hub62.pdf847,44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in OPUS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.