Life cycle assessment for early-stage process optimization of microbial biosurfactant production using kinetic models : a case study on mannosylerythritol lipids (MEL)

dc.contributor.authorBippus, Lars
dc.contributor.authorBriem, Ann-Kathrin
dc.contributor.authorBeck, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorZibek, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorAlbrecht, Stefan
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-14T13:38:10Z
dc.date.available2024-06-14T13:38:10Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.date.updated2024-04-25T13:23:32Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study assesses the environmental impacts of mannosylerythritol lipids (MELs) production for process optimization using life cycle assessment (LCA). MELs are glycolipid-type microbial biosurfactants with many possible applications based on their surface-active properties. They are generally produced by fungi from the family of Ustilaginaceae via fermentation in aerated bioreactors. The aim of our work is to accompany the development of biotechnological products at an early stage to enable environmentally sustainable process optimization. Methods: This is done by identifying hotspots and potentials for improvement based on a reliable quantification of the environmental impacts. The production processes of MELs are evaluated in a cradle-to-gate approach using the Environmental Footprint (EF) 3.1 impact assessment method. The LCA model is based on upscaled experimental data for the fermentation and purification, assuming the production at a 10 m³ scale. In the case analyzed, MELs are produced from rapeseed oil and glucose, and purified by separation, solvent extraction, and chromatography. Results: The results of the LCA show that the provision of substrates is a major source of environmental impacts and accounts for 20% of the impacts on Climate Change and more than 70% in the categories Acidification and Eutrophication. Moreover, 33% of the impacts on Climate Change is caused by the energy requirements for aeration of the bioreactor, while purification accounts for 42% of the impacts respectively. For the purification, solvents are identified as the main contributors in most impact categories. Discussion: The results illustrate the potentials for process optimization to reduce the environmental impacts of substrate requirements, enhanced bioreactor aeration, and efficient solvent use in downstream processing. By a scenario analysis, considering both experimental adaptations and prospective variations of the process, the laboratory development can be supported with further findings and hence efficiently optimized towards environmental sustainability. Moreover, the presentation of kinetic LCA results over the fermentation duration shows a novel way of calculating and visualizing results that corresponds to the way of thinking of process engineers using established environmental indicators and a detailed system analysis. Altogether, this LCA study supports and demonstrates the potential for further improvements towards more environmentally friendly produced surfactants.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFederal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)de
dc.identifier.issn2296-4185
dc.identifier.other1891892762
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-ds-145350de
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/14535
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-14516
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.uridoi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1347452de
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
dc.subject.ddc570de
dc.subject.ddc620de
dc.titleLife cycle assessment for early-stage process optimization of microbial biosurfactant production using kinetic models : a case study on mannosylerythritol lipids (MEL)en
dc.typearticlede
ubs.fakultaetBau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaftende
ubs.fakultaetEnergie-, Verfahrens- und Biotechnikde
ubs.fakultaetExterne wissenschaftliche Einrichtungende
ubs.institutInstitut für Akustik und Bauphysikde
ubs.institutInstitut für Grenzflächenverfahrenstechnik und Plasmatechnologiede
ubs.institutFraunhofer Institut für Bauphysik (IBP)de
ubs.institutFraunhofer Institut für Grenzflächen- und Bioverfahrenstechnik (IGB)de
ubs.publikation.seiten17de
ubs.publikation.sourceFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology 12 (2024), No. 1347452de
ubs.publikation.typZeitschriftenartikelde

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fbioe-12-1347452.pdf
Size:
2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artikel
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DataSheet1.PDF
Size:
71.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplement

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.3 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: