Comparing different coupling and modeling strategies in hydromechanical models for slope stability assessment

dc.contributor.authorMoradi, Shirin
dc.contributor.authorHuisman, Johan Alexander
dc.contributor.authorVereecken, Harry
dc.contributor.authorClass, Holger
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-31T08:25:30Z
dc.date.available2024-05-31T08:25:30Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.date.updated2024-04-25T13:23:32Z
dc.description.abstractThe dynamic interaction between subsurface flow and soil mechanics is often simplified in the stability assessment of variably saturated landslide-prone hillslopes. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of conventional simplifications in coupling and modeling strategies on stability assessment of such hillslopes in response to precipitation using the local factor of safety (LFS) concept. More specifically, it investigates (1) the impact of neglecting poroelasticity, (2) transitioning from full coupling between hydrological and mechanical models to sequential coupling, and (3) reducing the two-phase flow system to a one-phase flow system (Richards’ equation). Two rainfall scenarios, with the same total amount of rainfall but two different relatively high (4 mm h-1) and low (1 mm h-1) intensities are considered. The simulation results of the simplified approaches are compared to a comprehensive, fully coupled poroelastic hydromechanical model with a two-phase flow system. It was found that the most significant difference from the comprehensive model occurs in areas experiencing the most transient changes due to rainfall infiltration in all three simplified models. Among these simplifications, the transformation of the two-phase flow system to a one-phase flow system showed the most pronounced impact on the simulated local factor of safety (LFS), with a maximum increase of +21.5% observed at the end of the high-intensity rainfall event. Conversely, using a rigid soil without poroelasticity or employing a sequential coupling approach with no iteration between hydromechanical parameters has a relatively minor effect on the simulated LFS, resulting in maximum increases of +2.0% and +1.9%, respectively. In summary, all three simplified models yield LFS results that are reasonably consistent with the comprehensive poroelastic fully coupled model with two-phase flow, but simulations are more computationally efficient when utilizing a rigid porous media and one-phase flow based on Richards’ equation.en
dc.description.sponsorshipGerman Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)de
dc.description.sponsorshipframework of the R&D program GEOTECHNOLOGIENde
dc.description.sponsorshipproject ‘Characterization, monitoring and modelling of landslide-prone hillslopes (CMM-SLIDE)’de
dc.description.sponsorshipGerman Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate (BMWK)de
dc.description.sponsorshipGerman Aerospace Center for the AssimEO projectde
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441
dc.identifier.other1890566896
dc.identifier.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-ds-144559de
dc.identifier.urihttp://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/14455
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-14436
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.uridoi:10.3390/w16020312de
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
dc.subject.ddc620de
dc.titleComparing different coupling and modeling strategies in hydromechanical models for slope stability assessmenten
dc.typearticlede
ubs.fakultaetBau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaftende
ubs.fakultaetFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.institutInstitut für Wasser- und Umweltsystemmodellierungde
ubs.institutFakultätsübergreifend / Sonstige Einrichtungde
ubs.publikation.seiten16de
ubs.publikation.sourceWater 16 (2024), No. 312de
ubs.publikation.typZeitschriftenartikelde

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
water-16-00312.pdf
Size:
4.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artikel
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
water-16-00312-s001.zip
Size:
348.51 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
Supplement

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.3 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: