03 Fakultät Chemie
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/4
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Open Access Somatic cancer mutations in the MLL1 histone methyltransferase modulate its enzymatic activity and dependence on the WDR5/RBBP5/ASH2L complex(2017) Weirich, Sara; Kudithipudi, Srikanth; Jeltsch, AlbertSomatic missense mutations in the mixed lineage leukemia 1 (MLL1) histone H3K4 methyltransferase are often observed in cancers. MLL1 forms a complex with WDR5, RBBP5, and ASH2L (WRA) which stimulates its activity. The MM-102 compound prevents the interaction between MLL1 and WDR5 and functions as an MLL1 inhibitor. We have studied the effects of four cancer mutations in the catalytic SET domain of MLL1 on the enzymatic activity of MLL1 and MLL1–WRA complexes. In addition, we studied the interaction of the MLL1 mutants with the WRA proteins and inhibition of MLL1–WRA complexes by MM-102. All four investigated mutations had strong effects on the activity of MLL1. R3903H was inactive and S3865F showed reduced activity both alone and in complex with WRA, but its activity was stimulated by the WRA complex. By contrast, R3864C and R3841W were both more active than wild-type MLL1, but still less active than the wild-type MLL1–WRA complex. Both mutants were not stimulated by complex formation with WRA, although no differences in the interaction with the complex proteins were observed. These results indicate that both mutants are in an active conformation even in the absence of the WRA complex and their normal control of activity by the WRA complex is altered. In agreement with this observation, the activity of R3864C and R3841W was not reduced by addition of the MM-102 inhibitor. We show that different cancer mutations in MLL1 lead to a loss or increase in activity, illustrating the complex and tumor-specific role of MLL1 in carcinogenesis. Our data exemplify that biochemical investigations of somatic tumor mutations are required to decipher their pathological role. Moreover, our data indicate that MM-102 may not be used as an MLL1 inhibitor if the R3864C and R3841W mutations are present. More generally, the efficacy of any enzyme inhibitor must be experimentally confirmed for mutant enzymes before an application can be considered.Item Open Access Somatic cancer mutations in the MLL3-SET domain alter the catalytic properties of the enzyme(2015) Weirich, Sara; Kudithipudi, Srikanth; Kycia, Ina; Jeltsch, AlbertBACKGROUND: Somatic mutations in epigenetic enzymes are frequently found in cancer tissues. The MLL3 H3K4-specific protein lysine monomethyltransferase is an important epigenetic enzyme, and it is among the most recurrently mutated enzymes in cancers. MLL3 mainly introduces H3K4me1 at enhancers. RESULTS: We investigated the enzymatic properties of MLL3 variants that carry somatic cancer mutations. Asn4848 is located at the cofactor binding sites, and the N4848S exchange renders the enzyme inactive. Tyr4884 is part of an aromatic pocket at the active center of the enzyme, and Y4884C converts MLL3 from a monomethyltransferase with substrate preference for H3K4me0 to a trimethyltransferase with H3K4me1 as preferred substrate. Expression of Y4884C leads to aberrant H3K4me3 formation in cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that different somatic cancer mutations of MLL3 affect the enzyme activity in distinct and opposing manner highlighting the importance of experimentally studying the effects of somatic cancer mutations in key regulatory enzymes in order to develop and apply targeted tumor therapy.Item Open Access Investigation of the methylation of Numb by the SET8 protein lysine methyltransferase(2015) Weirich, Sara; Kusevic, Denis; Kudithipudi, Srikanth; Jeltsch, AlbertIt has been reported that the Numb protein is methylated at lysine 158 and 163 and that this methylation is introduced by the SET8 protein lysine methyltransferase [Dhami et al., (2013) Molecular Cell 50, 565-576]. We studied this methylation in vitro using peptide arrays and recombinant Numb protein as substrates. Numb peptides and protein were incubated with recombinant SET8 purified after expression in E. coli or human HEK293 cells. However, no methylation of Numb by SET8 was detectable. SET8 methylation of Histone H4 and p53 peptides and proteins, which were used as positive controls, was readily observed. While SET8 methylation of Numb in cells cannot be ruled out, based on our findings, more evidence is needed to Support this claim. It appears likely that another not yet identified PKMT is responsible for the reported methylation of Numb in cells.