10 Fakultät Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/11

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Bernhagen, PatrickSubject: search.filters.subject.320

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Die Repräsentation der Bürgerinnen und Bürger durch organisierte Interessen in Deutschland
    (2020) Pakull, Dominic; Goldberg, Felix; Bernhagen, Patrick
    In dieser Studie analysieren wir das Potenzial organisierter Interessen als Transmissionsriemen zwischen der Bevölkerung und politischen Institutionen im parlamentarischen System der Bundesrepublik zu fungieren. Wir verwenden Daten aus Experteninterviews mit Lobbyistinnen und Lobbyisten und einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage, um die Kongruenz zwischen den Themenfeldern zu ermitteln, welche die Bürgerinnen und Bürger und organisierten Interessen in Deutschland jeweils als wichtig ansehen. Ferner analysieren wir, ob sich die Kongruenz hinsichtlich der öffentlichen Salienz des Themas sowie des soziökonomischen Status oder der politischen Einstellungen der Bürgerinnen und Bürger unterscheidet. Dabei differenzieren wir zwischen Unternehmer- und Nichtunternehmerinteressen. Die Ergebnisse deuten auf eine moderate Themenkongruenz zwischen den Agenden der Bürgerinnen und Bürger und der organisierten Interessen hin. Diese Repräsentationsleistung wird jedoch überwiegend von Nichtunternehmerorganisationen erfüllt, die verstärkt an Themen arbeiten, die für die Bevölkerung salient sind. Ferner sind Bürgerinnen und Bürger mit extremeren Einstellungen besser repräsentiert als jene, die sich in der ideologischen Mitte befinden. Hingegen zeigen sich keine Unterschiede hinsichtlich des Einkommens und Geschlechts oder zwischen Ost- und Westdeutschland.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Shop till you drop? : venue choices of business and non-business interests in the European Union
    (2020) Pakull, Dominic; Marshall, David; Bernhagen, Patrick
    The EU offers a variety of access points through which interest groups can attempt to influence policy-making. In this paper, we analyze differences in the use of these access points, or venues, by interest groups. Considering the roles played by different EU institutions along the policy cycle, we argue that the venues differ by the extent to which they encourage lobbying from different interest groups. Analyzing survey responses by more than 700 European interest associations, we find that the distribution of access-seeking by business and non-business actors differs across venues. Reflecting its pivotal role at the pre-proposal stage, the Commission encourages non-business organizations to spend much of their finite lobbying resources. In the context of the European Parliament, non-business groups are not only interested in influencing its decisions, but also in connecting to ordinary Members of the European Parliament. Business groups, for their part, apply greater resources to the rapporteurs. Finally, we show that business groups also allocate their resources to regulatory agencies at the implementation stage in the policy process, where incomplete legislative contracts are finalized and non-business groups’ resources are depleted.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Beyond lobbying : the political determinants of adopting corporate social responsibility frameworks in the European Union and the USA
    (2022) Bernhagen, Patrick; Kollman, Kelly; Patsiurko, Natalka
    This paper explores the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) as an element in a corporation’s political action repertoire. Previous research has studied lobbying and CSR as a distinct means by which corporations seek to manage their non-market environment. Analyzing CSR as a political activity, we argue that corporations engage in CSR for the same reasons that prompt them to engage in lobbying. More specifically, we expect corporations to adopt CSR frameworks that are suitable to enhance their reputation in a given political arena. To evaluate this argument, we analyze the lobbying and CSR behavior in the EU and USA of over 2000 corporations from around the world. Our results show that lobbying and adopting CSR frameworks can be predicted by similar empirical models. Moreover, controlling for common predictors and endogeneity, lobbying in the EU is associated with an increased likelihood of a corporation adopting an appropriate CSR framework. However, corporations that lobby in Washington DC become less likely to engage in CSR the more they spend on lobbying. These findings shed new light on the relationship between lobbying and CSR while highlighting important differences in corporate non-market behavior across political arenas.